Your team
Coordination without another inbox full of PDFs.
Hazard channels keep discussion on the record, approvals route to the right reviewer, and optional digests summarize what changed — all scoped to your org’s footprint.
Hazard channels
Each hazard has a channel tied to its record — planners, fire, public health and leadership see the same thread without forwarding PDFs.
Approval mail when a score needs you
When a reviewer is required, the right people get an email with context and a link back to the check — not a generic “something changed” ping.
Daily roundup
Orgs can send one morning email: what moved yesterday, what still needs a decision, and which agent runs finished overnight.
Inbox by urgency
Needs-you items surface immediately; mentions and agent updates can wait for the roundup when your org turns that on.
Talk on the hazard, not about the hazard
Screens show Cedar Ridge County, a fictional example. People appear by role, not by name.
Wildland Fire
Deputy chief · 9:14
Can we cite the CWPP fuel-treatment acreage in the readiness paragraph?
Planner · 9:22
Yes — page 44, block 3 is already on the record. I linked it in the draft footnote.
A second pair of eyes when your rules require it
Review rules are configurable per org. When a score needs a reason or a second signature, Hazzard blocks the write until the check passes — the same enforcement the product shows in the score editor.
Likelihood: suggested 4, scored 3
Without a reason
1 check must pass first
3 of 4 passed
Justification accepted. Version 2 is on record for this dimension.
Evidence cited. The justification cites 3 sources.
Differs from the suggestion. Your score (3/5) differs from the suggested 4/5 — add a line on why, so the record carries your reasoning.
Justification is current. No new facts since it was accepted.
With a reason
All checks passed
4 of 4 passed
Justification accepted. Version 2 is on record for this dimension.
Evidence cited. The justification cites 3 sources.
Differs from the suggestion, with a reason. Suggested 4/5, chose 3/5 — your note is on the record.
Justification is current. No new facts since it was accepted.
Proposed by Planner· waiting on 1 approval
“Fuel treatments on 2,300 acres since 2022 lower the likelihood below the suggested 4.”
Needs-you now; everything else in the roundup
Members choose whether to receive email. Orgs enable the daily roundup and pick the hour it sends. Agent runs and document reads can surface in the same inbox when you want visibility without live-watching the workspace.
Inbox
Approval needed · Riverine Flooding
Impact 5 differs from draft — review requested
Daily roundup · Yesterday
2 hazards scored · 1 agent run finished · 0 needs you
Bring your documents. Leave with a cited brief.
Send us your public documents before the call and we’ll set up your workspace. You keep the brief whether or not you work with us.
Tell us about your project
We prepare from public data before we meet
You leave with a cited brief for one hazard
Already have an account? Sign in
Request a walkthrough
Takes about two minutes. A person reads each request.
Or start by marking your area on the map