For HMP, emergency-management, and planning firms

Deliver more plans without hiring more planners.

The 5-year clock is the market: thousands of plans come due every year, each a real engagement. Hazzard finds the work, speeds the work, and leaves the client with a living system that wins you the rebid.

The problem on your desk

Pipeline is a spreadsheet of guesses

Which plans expire when, where, at what population — public data, but assembling it into an outreach list is a week of intern time per quarter.

Every engagement starts from zero

The old plan is a PDF. The hazard data gets re-pulled, the tables get re-built, the methodology gets re-explained. Your margin is eaten by re-work.

The deliverable is disposable

You hand over a beautiful document that starts dying immediately. Five years later, the rebid is a coin flip because nothing tied the client to your work.

What Hazzard does about it

Start from the client's own documents

Intake the expiring plan and every study on file. Extraction with citations means your gap analysis starts on day one, not week six.

Sources4 documents
  • 2019 Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan

    PDF · 214 pp · county scope · data vintage 2018

    38 findings
  • THIRA / SPR 2023

    PDF · regional scope · uploaded today

    Processing
  • Chatfield Dam Emergency Action Plan

    PDF · restricted · external jurisdiction

    Queued
  • Wildland-urban interface assessment

    Consultant report · 2021 · city scope

    12 findings
Every extraction keeps its page-level citation, date, and geographic scope

Build the inventory once, defend it forever

Seeded hazard lists per county, structured profiles, and an approval workflow that makes the client's sign-off part of the record.

Risk inventory18 hazards in scope
severe weather 11flooding 6wildfire 3violence 5cyber 5public health 9+ hazmat, transportation, civil disruption…
  • Earthquake

    aka seismic hazard, ground shaking

    Established
  • Wildfire

    wind-driven · WUI exposure · smoke

    Established
  • Burnscar Flooding

    cascading from wildfire burn scars

    Needs review
  • Dam Failure

    external — Chatfield Dam, Douglas County

    Watched
  • Ice Jam Flooding

    suggested from state plan overlap

    Proposed
Scope changes require an authorized approver — new risks can be added without starting over

Leave behind a system, not a shelf PDF

The client keeps a living dashboard with your work at its core. When the next cycle comes, you're already inside.

Risk overviewCity of Lone Tree, CO

18

risks tracked

7

verified recently

5

need review

3

new partner findings

Next up

  • Approve updated flood profile

    Approver
  • Review extraction: Douglas County HMP

    Planner
  • Confirm dam-failure watch scope

    Approver
Every change is recorded: who, what, when, and what it superseded
$40k–$150k
per 5-year plan update engagement
~3,200
plans in the current expiring cohort
Radar-scored
outreach list, updated continuously
Get started

The 5-year clock is the market. Get ahead of it.

Create a free account to work the full scored Radar cohort and run your next engagement on structured data.