Community risk lives in a binder. The community doesn't.
The CRA that backed your last accreditation cycle aged out the day it was printed. Hazzard keeps community risk — hazards, exposure, service demand — current and cited, so your asks hold up.
The CRA goes stale between cycles
Accreditation and standards of cover want a current community risk assessment. Yours is a snapshot from whenever the last consultant engagement ended.
Capital asks get argued from vibes
Staffing, stations, apparatus — the board wants evidence. The evidence exists, scattered across the county HMP, NRI data, and your own run history.
Your boundary isn't your risk
Mutual aid, growth corridors, and the WUI don't respect district lines. A risk picture drawn only to your boundary understates what you actually respond to.
A footprint shaped like your response area
District boundaries, stations and facilities as first-class points, plus watched jurisdictions you cover through mutual aid — the map matches how you actually run.
- JurisdictionPrimary
City of Lone Tree
Municipal boundary
- WatchedExternal
Douglas County
Adjacent — upstream flood & dam context
- LocationConfirmed
Water Treatment Plant #2
Critical facility
- LocationConfirmed
Civic Center Campus
Government operations
- TerritoryResolving
North Service District
Service territory — spans 2 jurisdictions
Hazards seeded for your actual ground
Wildfire, flood, winter, hazmat — suggested from national risk data for the counties you cover, then decided and owned by your people, not a template.
- Established
Earthquake
aka seismic hazard, ground shaking
- Established
Wildfire
wind-driven · WUI exposure · smoke
- Needs review
Burnscar Flooding
cascading from wildfire burn scars
- Watched
Dam Failure
external — Chatfield Dam, Douglas County
- Proposed
Ice Jam Flooding
suggested from state plan overlap
Profiles that survive the board meeting
Probability, impact, readiness — each with the source, the confidence, and the open gaps stated. The ask writes itself when the evidence is attached.
Sources
USGS wildfire hazard potential · 2019 HMP §4.3 · CO-DFPC assessment · WUI study 2021
Bring your district. The risk picture builds itself around it.
Set up your district, drop your stations on the map, and see your seeded hazard list the same day.