For city managers, county administrators, and planning directors

You're accountable for risk you can't currently see.

Planning has the land-use picture, public works has the infrastructure picture, EM has the hazard picture. Hazzard makes them one picture — with provenance on every number you take to council.

The problem on your desk

Three departments, three answers

Ask planning, public works, and EM the same risk question and you get three documents from three years with three methodologies. All of them are partially right.

Politically hard calls need defensible ground

Development moratoria, mitigation spending, service levels — the decision is hard enough without the underlying data being unauditable.

Consultant work evaporates

Delivered, invoiced, filed away. The next engagement starts by re-collecting what the last one already found — and you pay for the re-collection.

What Hazzard does about it

Every document becomes shared ground

The HMP, the drainage study, the CWPP, the comp plan's hazard element — extracted into one inventory where each finding keeps its source, date, and scope.

Sources4 documents
  • 2019 Douglas County Hazard Mitigation Plan

    PDF · 214 pp · county scope · data vintage 2018

    38 findings
  • THIRA / SPR 2023

    PDF · regional scope · uploaded today

    Processing
  • Chatfield Dam Emergency Action Plan

    PDF · restricted · external jurisdiction

    Queued
  • Wildland-urban interface assessment

    Consultant report · 2021 · city scope

    12 findings
Every extraction keeps its page-level citation, date, and geographic scope

Risk profiles built for decisions

Probability, impact, and readiness per hazard, with the evidence behind each rating one click away. Budget hearings go differently when the number has a footnote.

Risk profile · WildfireVerified Jun 2026
ProbabilityHigh
ImpactSevere
ReadinessModerate

Sources

USGS wildfire hazard potential · 2019 HMP §4.3 · CO-DFPC assessment · WUI study 2021

Gap: no post-2020 burn-scar debris-flow data. Newer source data may change this confidence level.
Confidence: Medium · 4 sources · 1 open gap · owner: Emergency Manager

A dashboard the whole building shares

Staff, departments, and consultants see the same picture, who owns the next decision, and what changed since last quarter — between plan cycles, not just during them.

Risk overviewCity of Lone Tree, CO

18

risks tracked

7

verified recently

5

need review

3

new partner findings

Next up

  • Approve updated flood profile

    Approver
  • Review extraction: Douglas County HMP

    Planner
  • Confirm dam-failure watch scope

    Approver
Every change is recorded: who, what, when, and what it superseded
1
risk picture across every department
Roles
staff, reviewers, approvers — permissioned
Audit trail
on every finding and decision
Get started

Make the defensible call, with the evidence attached.

Create your organization and pull your existing plans into one living picture this week.